Skip to content

Tag: PowerView

Using Per-User Identity with Reporting Services and SharePoint

Almost anyone that has dealt with business intelligence in the Microsoft space is aware of the double hop problem. Simply put, when a user wants a server to execute a process on their behalf, that process will have a different identity, if any at all from the originating user, and therefore user focused operations such as per-user security trimming can’t be performed. The traditional solution to this problem in the Windows world has been to use Kerberos authentication, which allows server to pass on secure user tokens to other servers on behalf of originating users.

Unfortunately, Kerberos requires additional infrastructure, and is not adopted in all organizations. Smaller to mid sized organizations tend to stay away from adopting it, primarily due to its perceived complexity, which leaves them with the double hop problem. In the long term, claims based authentication promises to solve this problem, but it is still in its infancy, and is not adopted at all yet in the SQL Server suite of products, which is where double hop pain is felt most keenly.

The new BISM tabular model with Power View works around this problem by taking advantage of the EFFECTIVEUSERNAME property available in Analysis Services (I’ll be writing more about that later), as does Excel Services and PerformancePoint Services in SharePoint 2013. With EFFECTIVEUSERNAME, the server makes its connection with the data source using its service credentials, but then every query identifies the originating user, and those queries are executed in the context of that user. It’s a clever workaround, and takes care of much of the BI stack, but what about Reporting Services and relational data?

As it turns out, Reporting Services has been able to do this sort of thing for a long time. It’s just been rather cleverly concealed or misunderstood. SQL Server itself has a function, SetUser() that can be used by someone with sufficient privileges to impersonate another user. Originally implemented for testing purposes, Reporting Services takes advantage of it in much the same way that EFFECTIVEUSERNAME works in Analysis Services. The place to turn on this function is within a data source editor.

Using SharePoint Integrated mode, there are 3 main tools that can be used to define a data source. A data source can be created from any library that is configured to use the Report Data Source content type. In addition, SQL Server Report Builder can be used to edit a data source, or to create an embedded data source in a Report. Finally, Business Intelligence Development Studio (BIDS) or SQL Server Data Tools (depending on your version of SQL) can be used to create shared data sources. And the best news is, the interfaces are all different!

image                                        Setting Connection credentials in SQL Server Data Tools

image                                Setting Connection credentials in SharePoint 2013

image                                      Setting  Connection credentials in Report Builder

The option that we’re interested in, in all three cases is “Use this user name and password” (stored credentials). In the case of Data Tools or BIDS, the impersonation option isn’t available. Normally what would happen is that the connection would be deployed to the server, and then edited afterwards. We can therefore ignore this interface. However, examine the description of the impersonation option in both SharePoint and Report Builder. Although worded completely differently, they mean exactly the same thing. And in my opinion, Report Builder has it right. In fact it’s a stretch to say that the SharePoint screen isn’t dead wrong.

The SharePoint form can only be considered correct if the word “this” applies to the currently logged in user. To my mind, when I read that option, I am led to believe that it will be set to the account that is being used to make the connection (the stored credentials), when it is in fact the opposite. The setting in Report Builder is far clearer and more accurate.

When the option is checked, the SetUser() SQL function will be used in advance of any queries performed by the report, and the value will be set to the currently logged in user, NOT to the credentials specified under “Use this name and password”. The credentials specified here are used to make the connection to the SQL server, and because of the security restrictions of SetUser(), MUST have at least the dbOwner role on the queried database, or the SYSADMIN fixed role on the server. My recommendation is the latter if possible. This requirement also makes it very important to restrict the editing of the Data Source.

I imagine that most of the confusion around this feature comes from the fact that in most cases, when you are using impersonation, you are saying “I want to execute this function as this account”. However, in this case, with stored credentials, it’s always the stored credential executing the function, and what we’re asking it to do is to impersonate the currently logged in user. It’s sort of backwards to the way we normally think about impersonation. It’s not immediately intuitive as to why a logged in user would need to impersonate themselves, but that’s basically what’s happening.

Using this option therefore allows you to utilize per user permissions through Reporting Services on SharePoint without having to use Kerberos. This is a good thing, but you should be aware that in many cases, using a proxy account (by not selecting the impersonate option) may be a better option. There are several drawbacks to using per-user authentication. Impersonation should only be used when it is absolutely required.

If you open up the report processing screen for a report that uses a data source defined for impersonation, and select the “used cached data” option, you will receive the warning “This report can not be cached because one or more of the data sources credentials are not stored”.


The reality is that although the credentials are in fact stored, the report could be different for different users, and caching depends on a consistent result. Therefore, to prevent confusion, it’s not allowed. If the report is particularly large, this removes an important performance optimization technique.

From the same screen, it’s also made very clear that snapshotting is not an option when impersonation is being used, from the error “This report can not run from a snapshot because one or more of the data sources credentials are not stored”.


The reasons are the same as for caching, and the implication is that snapshots cannot be created, preventing us from storing a version history for the reports.

Finally, subscriptions are also rendered useless through the use of impersonation. An attempt to create a subscription to a report using an impersonated data connection results in the following error:


Per-user identities also require management on the SQL server side. Because we are impersonating the currently logged in user, that user must be managed from within SQL itself, whereas a proxy account only requires that account to have access to the data in question.

To summarize, Kerberos is not required to do per user queries in Reporting Services for relational data. The SetUser() function in SQL Server combined with the Execution Context option in data connections allow this to be performed quite effectively. However, just because it can be done, doesn’t mean that it should be. In many cases a simple proxy account can do the job, and should likely be allowed to, unless the requirements absolutely demand otherwise.


Quick PowerPivot/PowerView Demonstration on SharePoint Shop Talk

On a recent SharePoint Shoptalk, I presented a quick overview of PowerPivot and PowerView  working in SharePoint. The demonstration uses some real world data, and covers a number of the important features of the products. It’s not terribly long, and if you’re interested in these products, you may want to check it out. I’ve embedded it below.

Also – if you’re so inclined, SharePoint Shop Talk runs live every Thursday from 12:30 to 1:30 PM Eastern time. Come out and be a part of the conversation – you never know what you might learn.

Leave a Comment

Fixing Access Errors When Creating a BISM Connection for PowerView

PowerView is one of the shiny new features that are available to SharePoint users with the implementation od SQL Server 2012. To be sure, you don’t need to convert your database engine over to SQL Server 2012, but you do need to install PowerPivot for SharePoint, and/or the new Reporting Services service application for SharePoint, both only available in SQL Server 2012.

PowerView requires a connection to an xVelocity Analysis Services engine (formerly known as tabular mode or VertiPaq), or to an Excel spreadsheet with an embedded PowerPivot model in order to function. When connecting to the Analysis Services engine, there are a couple of permissions that need to be set on that engine that you should be aware of.

If you wish to connect to the Analysis Services engine, you have two choices. Firstly, you can use a Reporting Services connection (.rds) and select “Microsoft BI Semantic Model for PowerView” as the Data Source type.


Once this is done, it can be used to create PowerView reports. This approach works without any additional configuration. The reason that this is so is that Reporting Services takes advantage of the EFFECTIVEUSERNAME connection property for user impersonation. This is something that BISM does as well. When using an RS connection, the stored credential (in this case) is used to establish a connection with the data source, and then all queries are executed with the identity of the requesting end user (provided that the “Set execution context…” option is not selected.

For further reading on how Reporting Services uses the EFFECTIVEUSERNAME property, check this article. Since BISM uses the same property, it’s highly relevant to PowerView.

However, the problem arises if we choose the second option, and want to work with a BISM file directly. If we want to use a basic BISM file, we first add it by creating a document with the the BI Semantic Model content type.


However, the connection form is far simpler than the one used to configure the Reporting Services connection. You’ll notice immediately that there is no option for storing credentials. For a server connection, all that is necessary is a name for the connection, the name of the server, and the name of the database.

Unfortunately, if you haven’t gotten everything configured just so and you click ok, you’ll receive the error “Cannot connect to the server or database”.


This is due to the fact that when the server performs the validation check against the Analysis Services server, it uses a system account to first connect to the AS server. This is documented in this Connect forum entry. The corrective action is to add the account to the Analysis Services Server Administrator role:


What account needs to be added? The forum article I referenced above indicates the PowerPivot service account, which is now listed in SharePoint as the “SQL Server Analysis Services” account. However, my testing has indicated that the farm account is the one that is used to verify connections with Analysis Services, so that’s what I’m recommending here. This is only used for validation purposes, and to get around this problem without adding the account to the administrators role, you can simply select the “Save the link file without connection validation” option. This may however be unsettling to users.

Once you’ve created your BISM connection, you should then be able to use it to launch Excel, or create a PowerView report. When you launch Excel, the BISM is referenced by an Excel connection, which then connects directly to the data source with the credentials of the end user. No problem. However, if you attempt to create a PowerView  report, you may find yourself faced with “An error occurred while loading the model for the item or data source”.


In the body, it misleadingly leads you to believe that it’s the end user (btidwell in this case) that doesn’t have access. What should happen is that, as explained above, the Reporting Services service makes a connection with the AS server, and then uses the EffectiveUserName property to impersonate the user. For more detail on how BISM authenticates to back end data sources, see this MSDN article.

If you’re seeing this error, the chances are that the service account that is being used for Reporting Services doesn’t have access to the Analysis Services database.

As in the verification step above – granting the account access to the specific database doesn’t do it, you need to add the service account that is used by Reporting services to the Server Administrators role. Once you’ve done that, PowerView should behave smoothly.


Upcoming Speaking Engagements – Spring 2012

While the blog has been quieter than usual for the past couple of months, owing to a hectic schedule, I do have a number of speaking engagements coming up that I wanted to promote. All of them are related to SharePoint Business Intelligence in one way or another, and all are in the Toronto/South Western Ontario area. If you’d like to come out and talk SharePoint, Business Intelligence, or just indulge in a SharePint or two, I would love to see you there.

Hamilton SharePoint User Group
Thursday, Feb 16 2012
SQL Server Reporting Services with SharePoint
SQL Server Reporting Services provides a rich reporting environment, and integration with SharePoint makes it seem seamless to end users. How does Reporting Services impact the SharePoint environment? This presentation will walk through the basic features of Reporting Services, and architectural considerations when installing in a SharePoint farm. In addition, some of the differences included in the upcoming SQL Server 2012 version of Reporting Services will be discussed.
Toronto SharePoint User Group
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
What’s new in SQL Server 2012 for SharePoint
SQL Server 2012 brings a wealth of new features to the core database used by SharePoint. However, it also brings a number of exciting new Business Intelligence features right to your SharePoint users.

This session will walk through a number of the new features that have a direct impact on SharePoint administrators, designers and end users, with in depth demonstrations of how to configure and use them. These features include significant architectural changes to Reporting services, the new BISM or tabular engine for Analysis Services and PowerPivot, and the new end user focused reporting tool, PowerView.

SharePoint Summit
May 15, 2012
Reporting for Duty – Best Practices for Reporting Services with SharePoint


Reporting Services and SharePoint have been working together since SharePoint 2003. SQL Server 2005 SP1 brought the ability to use Reporting Services in Integrated Mode through a SharePoint Add in, and with SQL Server 2012, Reporting Services is a fully fledged SharePoint Service Application, and some features, the new PowerView in particular, are only available through SharePoint Integrated Mode.

Reporting Services bring a wealth of benefits to your SharePoint farm, but can also have a significant impact on it. This session will discuss the do’s and don’ts for a successful Reporting Services implementation. It will cover architectural considerations through to Report design, for both the Reporting Services Add In (SQL Server 2005-2008) and the new Reporting Services Service Application (SQL Server 2012).

Leave a Comment